Ticket #8 (new enhancement)
Opened 5 years ago
No console mode to disable seeing links/unlinks.
|Reported by:||pseudo||Owned by:|
[10:20:42] <MC_8> .console -mcobs
[10:20:42] <chipset> Set your console to #abc123: - (none)
[10:20:45] <chipset> * (Limbo) Disconnected from: warez. No reason (lost 1
bot and 1 user)
[10:20:46] <chipset> * (Limbo) Linked to warez.
Version: 188.8.131.52 -- v1.6.7+argv (CVS)
On a 200+ botnet, I'm getting tired of seeing all these links and unlinks.
Tried to disable the console to show it, and found that I cannot. I'm stuck
with the extra scrole.
Comment #1 From BarkerJr? 2002-10-02 12:02:22
* Bug 268 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *
It seems that older bots send 'ct' commands along with unlinks. But, I also
noticed that the bot displays unlinks from newer bots, too. If that makes any
In other words, as long as older bots are on the net, we may never be able to
stop the link msgs. On the other hand, we may be able to reduce them.
Created an attachment (id=30) [details]
Patch to fix console +b
I think this patch may fix it. It seems that the text was being sent to all
dcc chats instead of using putlog, cause the msgs didn't even show up in a log,
which seems odd to me.
This will not hide links/unlinks from bots directly linked to the bot you're
on. Only remote bots. I figure local bot msgs are important enough to be put
Comment #4 From Psychopath 2002-11-18 10:57:39
* Bug 284 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *
Comment #5 From Will Buckner 2003-01-17 22:28:00
Maybe a better option would be a flag to not show broadcasts.
Comment #6 From Carl M. Gregory 2003-07-25 09:28:31
BarkerJr?: This will not hide links/unlinks from bots directly linked to the
bot you're on. Only remote bots. I figure local bot msgs are important enough
to be put through -b.
Who's to say what is important though? I think it should be pipped through the
b console regardless of it's importance. TCL Error's are important to me,
using console o, but not important to others ... so it's importance is relative
to the user ... the user should be able to define what is important and what
isn't (therefor the console flags).
Comment #7 From Will Buckner 2004-01-13 19:12:52
Hmm.. what are we going to do about this one?
Comment #8 From Tothwolf 2004-04-19 04:57:03
Created an attachment (id=47) [details]
Patch that adds console +i for chatout() messages
I don't think changing chatout() to putlog() in a few places is the right way
to go about fixing this bug. I've created a patch that adds a console +i
setting specifically for chatout() botnet info.
Upping to 1.6.18.